> Am 21.01.2014 um 06:57 schrieb Michael Weibel <[email protected]>:
> I guess that’s part of the problem here: Candy is developed for general usage > and, because they like certain things about Candy, some users are adapting it > to their own custom environments (which is perfectly fine and I’m really glad > it’s happening). However, if such basic decisions (like real vs. room jid) > need to be different, a fork of Candy or an own implementation might be more > the way to go. Basically that's why I started a framework (or toolkit) some years ago. Unfortunately it never got finished although I've been using parts of it at a couple of projects.
_______________________________________________ JDev mailing list Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
