On 24/09/2013 10:25, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:
Thanks Seán!
Then I'll ask for an approval to backport 8007454, which is applied
cleanly.
Consider both bugs fixes approved. You could use this mail thread to
review the 7147084 changes if you want. They're innocent enough. Alan or
someone else should be able to review.
regards,
Sean.
And once it is pushed, I'll initiate a review for 7147084 with
adjustments.
Sincerely,
Ivan
On 24.09.2013 12:59, Seán Coffey wrote:
Approved for jdk7u-dev but you'll need a review first due to the
adjustments needed in the backport.
Hopefully, you'll be resolving these issues with 2 different
changesets. It's been the trend in the past and helps keep changesets
more aligned to those in JDK 8.
regards,
Sean.
On 24/09/2013 09:08, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:
Sending to the correct ML
--------------
Hello!
We have a request to backport fix for 7147084.
First, it depends on the fix for 8007454, so the webrev includes it
too.
Second, the fix had to be adjusted a bit.
- I had to manually replaced Java_java_lang_ProcessImpl_create()
function body with the new version, as 'hg patch' could not handle
automatically.
- I had to replace wide-char strings to regular char*, in all the
calls to win32Error() function.
Combined webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~igerasim/7147084/0/webrev/
BUGS:
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=7147084
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8007454
JDK8 Changesets:
7147084: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/2c4f1081a0fa
8007454: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/0a2b308cc82d
Reviews for jdk8 fix:
7147084:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2013-August/019604.html
8007454:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2013-February/014602.html
I had set up a JPRT job, which completed successfully.
All the .*jdk_lang.* test passed.
Sincerely yours,
Ivan Gerasimov
