Unanswered patch on webrev-dev looks related: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/webrev-dev/2015-November/000134.html
My own old copy of webrev is working for me, so I dare not touch it! --- Thanks for your work on jdk7u91 - we are happily using it without problems! On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Andrew Hughes <gnu.and...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Andrew Hughes <gnu.and...@redhat.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > It is, but both versions of the webrev script I have produce them. Do > you > > > know where I can get the latest version? > > > > > > webrev is the most forked piece of software in history. Naturally I have > > my own... But today there is a canonical one: > > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/code-tools/webrev/file/3ecf0f883475/webrev.ksh > > webrev tries to show diffs against some reference revision. Here it > seems > > to think the reference revision is "0". > > > > Just to follow up (been caught up with 6): > > I tried generating them using the latest version from that tree and still > saw > the same problem. Even explicitly specifying a comparison revision of > jdk7u85 > didn't seem to help. The patch is right, so I'm not sure where it is going > crazy. > -- > Andrew :) > > Senior Free Java Software Engineer > Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) > > PGP Key: ed25519/35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net) > Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04 C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222 > > PGP Key: rsa4096/248BDC07 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net) > Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07 > >
