Attendees: Michelle Caisse, Michael Bouschen, Craig Russell
Agenda:
1. Typesafe queries for JDOQL - discussion.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-652
Are persistent interfaces intended to be supported? Michael has found
that the company model causes DataNucleus preprocessor to fail. AI
Michael file a DN JIRA.
The DN preprocessor only seems to process classes that have
annotations. Is this the intent? Many JDO classes only have persistent
metadata in the .jdo xml files, and these classes seem to be skipped.
Craig's understanding is that the pre-processor should be able to
process classes even with no annotations at all. The decision as to
which classes to process should be taken by the processor itself, not
the javac that invokes it. But this is just intuition.
2. JDOQL : Bulk Update and Delete Operations https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-617
Some comments have been made about how to handle life cycle
callbacks when instances are updated or deleted using the query
capability.
3. Maven 2 upgrade https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-647
Michelle is still having trouble running TCK with the new machine
(Windows 7).
4. Other issues
Action Items from weeks past:
[April 8 2011] AI Craig comment on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-617
re the utility of the update operator.
[Feb 25 2011] AI Michael, Craig, other volunteers: Look at
Typesafe ... query capability for JDOQL https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-652
Craig L Russell
Architect, Oracle
http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:craig.russ...@oracle.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
