Note that the goal here is to persuade the Turtle writer to make small Turtles from a model.
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: > Ian's correct - the local part can't start with a digit. It's part of the > turtle space. > > In terms of writing Turtle by hand: > > @base <uri:jug:001f469cc17412da1ce53fa1f9b67481> . > > <#12> > a rex:Organization ; > ... > > works but the writer isn't clever enough to use a base in the file (@base > does not survive parsing). If you write it with that base, it might work. > > > In design terms, it's a completely unnessary restriction. It's not a XML > QNAME or related to it any more. > > Long version: > http://seaborne.blogspot.com/2010/06/standardising-rdf-syntaxes.html > > SPARQL does not have this restriction because the last working group got > pushback not to follow Turtle exactly here, especially from communities > using URNs generated from existing systems .... > > Hopefully, the next RDF WG will do the right thing. > > Andy > > On 26/12/10 18:08, Ian Dickinson wrote: >> >> I should have added: >> >>> blob:12 >>> probably won't parse as you expect >> >> and therefore the writer is smart enough not to generate it. >> >> Ian >
