GZIP is next after fixing the URIs. Also, I have some literals that are long and come around over and over, so factoring them out to their own triples is on the agenda.
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: > Write to a gzip'ed stream? > > Andy > > On 26/12/10 18:36, Benson Margulies wrote: >> >> Note that the goal here is to persuade the Turtle writer to make small >> Turtles from a model. >> >> On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Andy Seaborne<[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Ian's correct - the local part can't start with a digit. It's part of the >>> turtle space. >>> >>> In terms of writing Turtle by hand: >>> >>> @base<uri:jug:001f469cc17412da1ce53fa1f9b67481> . >>> >>> <#12> >>> a rex:Organization ; >>> ... >>> >>> works but the writer isn't clever enough to use a base in the file (@base >>> does not survive parsing). If you write it with that base, it might >>> work. >>> >>> >>> In design terms, it's a completely unnessary restriction. It's not a XML >>> QNAME or related to it any more. >>> >>> Long version: >>> http://seaborne.blogspot.com/2010/06/standardising-rdf-syntaxes.html >>> >>> SPARQL does not have this restriction because the last working group got >>> pushback not to follow Turtle exactly here, especially from communities >>> using URNs generated from existing systems .... >>> >>> Hopefully, the next RDF WG will do the right thing. >>> >>> Andy >>> >>> On 26/12/10 18:08, Ian Dickinson wrote: >>>> >>>> I should have added: >>>> >>>>> blob:12 >>>>> probably won't parse as you expect >>>> >>>> and therefore the writer is smart enough not to generate it. >>>> >>>> Ian >>> >
