You might like XML better if you parsed it with woodstox, let alone used the FIS representation.
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 26/12/10 19:17, Benson Margulies wrote: >> >> Meanwhile, did you see my message about FastInfoset? Hypothetically, >> XML+FastInfoset might prove convenient this "I need to move a lot of >> RDF around." > > Could do - interesting experiment to do. Adding new readers/writers is > possible (but tricky currently - work-in-progress). > > The fastest and most scalable way to deal with RDF is usually to print and > load as N-triples. Compressed N-Triples is typically x8. > > The pretty printing Turtle is slow because it has to analysis the model for > structures and track all statements written. N-triples just raw writes the > DB. It does not scale to very large models. > > XML has proven costly to parse - N-triples is really close to just byte > shifting. > > TDB loads fastest from .nt or .nt.gz (or .nq and .nq.gz). > > Andy >
