On Thursday 23 January 2014 08:23:21 Zeitoon wrote:
> Ok, this means then that there will be no guarantee that the next LTS
> release will be more stable than the previous one.

I don't fully understand this implication, but anyway, we have never given any  
guarantee about the stability :-) Please note that backporting to older LTSs 
doesn't imply better stability as backports itself can introduce new bugs and 
the risk of such bugs grows with backporting to older and older releases 

> Also, Richard Made a point with the security patches.

well, this is community driven effort and thus the resources are limited. If 
someone wants to start with backporting security bugfixes into more LTSs, I 
guess everybody will welcome such effort, but so far, as already Daniel 
mentioned in previous email, we had hard times to keep the schedule (well, we 
don't keep it at all) just with one LTS, so I can hardly imagine that we would 
support more LTS (at least with current schedule).

Thanks for understanding
Vojta

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to