Cool, Bruno. Yes please, but in the future.... :^)
Our hope is that by the end of the week, we will have such a .war or PR for folks to play with. At the moment, not quite. ...but if you are really hungry for code, KK has just set up this branch: https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/tree/config-ui-changes ...which we are busily troubleshooting. ...we will be tracking our own progress here: https://trello.com/b/5587X0Dt/ux-hackathon-2015-jul On Wednesday, July 22, 2015 at 3:40:52 PM UTC-7, kinow wrote: > > Thanks for all the hard work Gus. > > I can try building a Jenkins version with your pull requests, or if you > have .war, I can try it with the active-choices-plugin, which relies on the > DOM structure created in the build with parameters screen. CSS changes > won't break the plug-in, but moving tables, divs, inputs, might break it. > > Cheers > Bruno > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Gus Reiber <[email protected] <javascript:>> > *To:* Jenkins Developers <[email protected] <javascript:>> > *Cc:* [email protected] <javascript:> > *Sent:* Thursday, July 23, 2015 10:31 AM > *Subject:* Re: Jenkins UX > > Awesome, awesome, awesome feedback all around. > > So if I can summarize the feedback so far, it sounds to me like > Kanstantsin is the most skeptical, but few if any of you are 100% sold, > which is how it should be. Possible sources of discontent seem to break > down like this: > > - Don't forget about Tom's work and the existing SimpleTheme plugin > - Color, font, and border choices: Seems like maybe we like the simple > black and white better, with less borders, less margins and smaller text > (though that is not a consensus) > - Collapse mechanism: The idea of clear segmentation seems to be > generally embraced (Kanstantsin being the exception), but the sort of > pegged ToC tracking that Bootstrap uses might be prefered. > - Console log should be better, too (I totally agree with that, but > didn't choose that piece of the GUI as a starting point so am punting on > thinking about that for the moment) > > Most of my goal here is to show the sorts of tangible benefits that an > overhaul of a GUI can bring that go beyond what can be done against the > current Jenkins DOM with CSS alone. KK, Daniel, Tom and I agree that is the > case enough to start organizing ourselves into both code and outreach to > start making that case through forums and demos like this, and pull > requests which we are starting to create. > > As I see it, we will want to break down pull requests along this topic > into manageable bites, the first of which being largely infrastructure and > only minimal visual changes, if at all. It is my belief that the first step > of doing any modernizing of the config page is to pull it out of tables and > refactor hudson-behavior to function with a semantic and logically nested > DOM structure, such that new styles of input elements can be folded into > both core config items and plugin configuration without a lot of the crazy > DOM wackery that happens today. Also, I think PrototypeJS and YUI are > essentially dead technologies, so we will need to cast off those shackles. > > ...thus our first PR is likely to be all about enabling DOM changes to the > jelly resources files in the form directory (even prior to the actual DOM > changes). > > Anyway, in the next few days, KK and Daniel will be looking to set up a > hangout in which at least some of us might be able to get together and > examine the ins and outs of this technical web. > > ...expect a seperate note from them with more specifics, shortly. > > > > > > > On Thursday, July 16, 2015 at 9:03:49 AM UTC-7, Gus Reiber wrote: > > As threatened, but at long last, I have a demo video and associated blog > post.... not really posted to a blog, but, still something that can be read > and comment on.... > > Please take a look, and send feedback: > video: > http://youtu.be/1Qn4jEwAeGc > > post: > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sjd_Yl7wzyxVoaFurSGAVfgWNSwlnSLJztx7uexdgxE/edit?usp=sharing > > > > On Monday, June 22, 2015 at 4:37:17 AM UTC-7, Gus Reiber wrote: > > Hey all, > Been a long time since my last post, as I had been cramming getting a > prototype built for JUCs DC and London. I am happy to report Tom and my > presentation was well received in DC. Now we are off to the UK. > > Now that we have a simifunctional prototype, we will be working to figure > out how to best post it so community members can provide feedback. > > Thanks again for your interest. Please stay tuned. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Jenkins Developers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] <javascript:>. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/a77c5054-7888-415c-9ae5-be73aa9e9af3%40googlegroups.com > > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/a77c5054-7888-415c-9ae5-be73aa9e9af3%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/dde34b50-5a8c-4bf9-9f03-df884fd1efd5%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
