On 17.09.2015, at 11:26, Tom Fennelly <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sorry ... typo in #2 on the last email. I should have said "This only seems > relevant to me if the answer to #1 is no" i.e. we will upgrade if the plugin > does not meet the minimum version requirements i.e. is less than the bundled > version (in /WEB-INF/detached-plugins). Yep, it looks like that's what Jesse is arguing for. I'd have kept pinning around for now, but it looks _really_ unpopular. It's basically what we discussed a few days back, without the pinning. Regarding your proposal, note that there are detached plugins that have since picked up dependencies. Those dependencies would also be in detached-plugins/ right? Not sure we should keep plugins/ -- probably. Ideally official Jenkins would come without any. (Which means we'd lose Translation Assistance... not sure what a good solution is here...) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/6B9AF998-56AE-4598-BE53-74256A9B8906%40beckweb.net. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
