On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:59 AM, <fkp...@gmail.com> wrote: > how about job property?
Seems like a poor approach. My recommendation is KISS: if there is some information produced by a step which another step call might need, just return it and let the script bind it to a local variable. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CANfRfr0deXuFdHnj7r7zaQA%2BH3b%2BbB6o2WiSmoV9ah%3D8GL92mA%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
