On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:59 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > how about job property?
Seems like a poor approach. My recommendation is KISS: if there is some information produced by a step which another step call might need, just return it and let the script bind it to a local variable. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CANfRfr0deXuFdHnj7r7zaQA%2BH3b%2BbB6o2WiSmoV9ah%3D8GL92mA%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
