2018-05-08 21:08 GMT+02:00 Liam Newman <[email protected]>: > > Just FYI: Nicolas asked a question of me in a GH comment: > https://github.com/jenkinsci/jep/commit/78bede6c731e7a85a90ca374ca1c39 > 4e219aa961#commitcomment-28894501 > > @bitwiseman <https://github.com/bitwiseman> Discussion on plugin >> management was probably introduced in this JEP too early as we don't have a >> prototype for it (update center doesn't even have the required metadata) >> Would it make sense to revert this commit so we can follow-up with JCasC >> as an approved JEP, and prepare another JEP about plugin management (which >> would apply to docker images and probably few other use-cases) ? > > > I figured I'd respond here rather than buried in GH comments. > > Nicolas, > To be clear: I'm not Reviewer for this JEP. I set it back to this > "Draft" with the agreement of the sponsor as part of a clarification of the > JEP process. >
Yes, that's why I asked you to revert this if we just want to get this discussion in a separate document. > > It sounds like Ewelina is working on further updates (including > incorporating the JOM feedback - yay!) and hasn't requested Review for > Acceptance yet. As sponsor, when she believes the JEP meets the > requirements for Accepted status, I'm sure she'll request that it be > reviewed again. > ok, make sense as well. > > Ewelina, > Thanks for taking the time to incorporate feedback and to make sure > everyone is clear about the on-going status of the project. I don't know > that I need to be involved in the maintainers meeting, but feel free to > send me an invite. > > -Liam > > > > On Tuesday, May 8, 2018 at 3:34:28 AM UTC-7, Ewelina Wilkosz wrote: >> >> just a short update - JEP update in progress, next week we're planning a >> short maintainers status meeting where I hope to clarify stuff and PR will >> be sent >> >> On Thursday, May 3, 2018 at 12:24:07 AM UTC+2, Jesse Glick wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 3:58 PM, Ewelina Wilkosz <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > Any of you interested in contributing to that one? Please let me know, >>> so we >>> > don't duplicate >>> >>> I will leave the reasoning to you! Just bringing up things that seemed >>> to merit discussion. >>> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Jenkins Developers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ > msgid/jenkinsci-dev/56c5a171-f7ed-4f53-bd67-c79bb182bb91% > 40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/56c5a171-f7ed-4f53-bd67-c79bb182bb91%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CANMVJzmqJkNe3AJV%3DuQ5cyZSMWhhieeUcAXEmxUj5-c6w1w5qg%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
