Are you mis-matched in your pairing? Windows Server 2012 is in the Windows
8 family. Windows Server 2008 is the 'mate' to Windows 7, isn't it?

On Fri, Apr 10, 2020, 8:48 AM Tim Jacomb <[email protected]> wrote:

> Sounds reasonable to me +1,
> I speak as someone who barely ever touches Windows and never for Jenkins
> though
>
> Thanks
> Tim
>
> On Friday, 10 April 2020 13:26:51 UTC+1, Oleg Nenashev wrote:
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> As you probably know, Jenkins core and some plugins contain native code,
>> and hence they rely on operating systems and platforms. In principle
>> Jenkins can run everywhere where you can run Java 8 or Java 11, but in
>> practice there are some limitations. Notably we use Java Native Access  and
>> Java Native Runtime libraries which provide wide support for platforms, but
>> there are other components. In the case of Windows platforms we use Windows
>> Service Wrapper (WinSW) <https://github.com/winsw/winsw> and Windows
>> Process Management Library (WinP) <https://github.com/kohsuke/winp>,
>> which depend on Windows versions and, in the case of windows services, on
>> .NET Framework.
>>
>> In the Jenkins Platform SIG <https://jenkins.io/sigs/platform/> we have
>> an open topic about Windows support policy in Jenkins. Currently we have no
>> documented support policy for Windows, and it becomes an obstacle for
>> maintainers of Windows-focused components and plugins in the
>> Jenkins project. As a maintainer of WinSW and WinP, I have to be very
>> conservative about Windows support. But it comes at a cost to users, not
>> just maintenance overhead. At the end of the day it also blocks us from
>> adopting new Windows features and making Jenkins more stable/maintenable on
>> modern Windows platforms.
>>
>> I know for sure that there are Jenkins users running on Windows XP, but
>> IMHO it becomes more and more legacy use-case. Last popular industry
>> version had EoL in 2019 (WinXP Exmbedded POSReady
>> <https://www.techrepublic.com/article/windows-xp-dies-final-death-as-embedded-posready-2009-reaches-end-of-life/>),
>> and IMO it is time to drop WinXP support in new Jenkins releases. Same goes
>> to 32bit systems and non-mainstream architectures like Itanium, we could
>> at least reduce the support level there.
>>
>> I suggest the following policy:
>>
>>    - All installers and service wrappers require Windows 7 / Windows
>>    Server 2012 or above (and .NET framework 4.0+). They support 64bit
>>    platforms only. Support for other platforms are provided via manual
>>    jenkins.war deployment
>>    - Jenkins master runtime requires Windows 7 / Windows Server 2012 or
>>    above. It may work on older versions, but we do not guarantee 
>> compatibility
>>    - Jenkins agent runtime requires Windows 7 / Windows Server 2012 or
>>    above. It may work on older versions, but we do not guarantee 
>> compatibility
>>    - For all Windows service installations .NET Framework 4.0 or above
>>    is required. It is a default version in Windows versions specified above
>>    - Jenkins master and agent Docker images are not required to provide
>>    images for the supported platforms. They can move ahead as maintainers
>>    prefer
>>    - Plugins can define their own support policy, but they are strongly
>>    advised to align their Windows support policy with the Jenkins Core
>>    versions.
>>       - We have no way to communicate potential Windows support issues
>>       via update center at the moment, so following the Jenkins core 
>> requirements
>>       is what we can recommend as the best option
>>    - Custom Jenkins packaging may have different requirements
>>    (Jenkinsfile Runner, WARs built by Custom WAR Packager)
>>
>> Would appreciate feedback from maintainers and Windows users! Any
>> comments and change suggestions are welcome.
>>
>> If other Plaftorm SIG folks agree with me, I would suggest to add this
>> area to the Jenkins Roadmap <https://jenkins.io/project/roadmap/>. I
>> also created a JENKINS-61865
>> <https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-61865> EPIC to track
>> changes there. I will create tasks in the EPIC once there is a consensus in
>> this thread.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Oleg Nenashev
>> Platform SIG
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Jenkins Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/c755618e-b046-44b9-b155-38fdaba6d214%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/c755618e-b046-44b9-b155-38fdaba6d214%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAD34T64_%2BsOOEMpzH%2BPYtyvop-f_CdzMSq1t6my16DMv%3DqiTQg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to