+1 for proposal (1.4 version)

Tracy

On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 5:06 PM Oleg Nenashev <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> As a follow-up to the previous Governance meeting, I would like to propose
> updating the Jenkins Code of Conduct
> <https://www.jenkins.io/project/conduct> (CoC). Currently it is based on 
> Contributor
> Covenant 1.3
> <https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/1/3/0/code-of-conduct/>
> which was officially adopted on Jan 06, 2016. Contributor Covenant is
> widely used in open-source projects, and this was the most recent version
> at that time. Now there are versions 1.4
> <https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4/code-of-conduct/> and
> 2.0 <https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/2/0/code_of_conduct/>
> of Contributor Covenant.
>
> * Why update? * New versions of Contributor Covenant  extend our version
> significantly, e.g. pledge and standards, unacceptable behavior,
> representing the project and social media matters, etc. These changes are
> pretty important IMHO. Also, we have recently started a process of aligning
> the Jenkins project with graduated project criteria defined by the
> Continuous Delivery Foundation (see the proposal from Tracy Miranda here
> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/jenkinsci-dev/I3sUP2SB2JI>). One
> of the checklist items is adopting the CDF's Code of Conduct
> <https://github.com/cdfoundation/toc/blob/master/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md>
> which is based on Contributor Covenant 1.4.
>
> *Background.*  At the last Governance Meeting on Jun 03 we had a sync-up
> with Dan Lorenc who is the current CDF Technical Oversight Committee chair.
> Links are here: recording <https://youtu.be/R80Rv6G-Oww?t=1728>, meeting
> notes
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/11Nr8QpqYgBiZjORplL_3Zkwys2qK1vEvK-NYyYa4rzg/edit#bookmark=id.66p0d0acy2w2>.
> Some clarification we have got:
>
>    - CDF does not require us to adopt the CDF Code of Conduct as long as
>    the Jenkins project has one and as long as they are aligned. We interpret
>    it as using a similar or compatible version of Contributor Covenant.
>    - CDF is fine with a 2-stage escalation process. We can keep the
>    Jenkins Governance Board as a first stage as it is currently documented
>    <https://www.jenkins.io/project/conduct/#reporting>. CDF can act as a
>    second level of escalation and as an entity for mitigating cross-project
>    Code of Conduct escalations should it happen
>    - Right now there is no confirmed plan to update CDF's Code of Conduct
>    to version 2.0
>
> There is also a consensus that we would like to update the code of
> conduct, especially taking the terminology update discussions
> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/jenkinsci-dev/CLR55wMZwZ8> which
> are a sensitive topic to many Jenkins contributors. We have 3 options:
>
>    - Update to Contributor Covenant 1.4
>    <https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4/code-of-conduct/>
>    - Update to Contributor Covenant 2.0
>    <https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/2/0/code_of_conduct/>.
>    Note that there is still no changelog for the version 2.0, some "breaking
>    changes" are mentioned here
>    <https://github.com/ContributorCovenant/contributor_covenant/issues/744>.
>    There is also no Git tags, so we cannot really ensure that the version 2.0
>    is fixed
>    - Keep it as is, Contributor Covenant 1.3
>    <https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/1/3/0/code-of-conduct/>
>
> *Proposal*: I suggest updating Jenkins Code of Conduct to version 1.4.
> Taking the lack of changelog and Git tags for the version 2.0, I am not
> sure it is worth going with this version for now. The breaking changes also
> seem to be pretty important, and I am not sure we want to deviate from the
> CDF's CoC version and explore the legal differences. We can update CoC
> again when and if CDF goes to a higher version of Contributor Covenant.
>
> I would appreciate any feedback, and I suggest to vote on the update at
> the next Governance meeting
> <https://www.jenkins.io/project/governance-meeting/> on June 17th.
>
> Thanks for your time,
> Oleg Nenashev
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Jenkins Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAPfivLCHDM6jEZJ%3D6t%3DWN%2BRJLiGFw%2BFTvxsjGzuKKoWHZWyW6A%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAPfivLCHDM6jEZJ%3D6t%3DWN%2BRJLiGFw%2BFTvxsjGzuKKoWHZWyW6A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CACTaz6oSKm1eESf6%3DKo5%2BJ-a2Y26a17Wkd%2BjV6fpByWWhZHw-Q%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to