Hi all, Pull request with Code of conduct is ready for update: https://github.com/jenkins-infra/jenkins.io/pull/3477
Best regards, Oleg On Friday, June 19, 2020 at 2:12:07 PM UTC+2, Oleg Nenashev wrote: > > UPD: At the Jun 17 Governance meeting we discussed the Code of Conduct > update and agreed to go forward with updating to Contributor Covenant 2.0 > (6 votes in favor, no against/abstains). We have NOT approved the new code > of Conduct yet. > > Next steps: > > - Oleg - to propose a pull request to jenkins.io with a Code of > Conduct update > - Contributor Covenant Update > - CDF as a second level of escalation > - Aligning enforcement rules, etc. > - Formally voting for a suggested code of conduct PR at the next > governance meeting (July 1st) > > Meeting notes: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/11Nr8QpqYgBiZjORplL_3Zkwys2qK1vEvK-NYyYa4rzg/edit#bookmark=id.yr5dfh4k94u6 > Recording of the discussion: https://youtu.be/3g0GKvVHfgI?t=501 > > Best regards, > Oleg > > On Tuesday, June 16, 2020 at 5:51:07 PM UTC+2, Oleg Nenashev wrote: >> >> Update w.r.t the code of conduct update options: >> >> - We got a response from Dan Lorenc (CDF TOC chair) about going with >> 2.0:* "I think from the TOC perspective, we're fine with anything >> above Contributor Covenant 1.3. We'd prefer projects upgrade over time, >> but >> don't want to be prescriptive about when or how." * >> https://lists.cd.foundation/g/cdf-toc/message/442. I interpret is as >> that we could go with 2.0 >> - I submitted a pull request to Contributor Covenant which summarizes >> the changes between 1.4 and 2.0: >> https://github.com/ContributorCovenant/contributor_covenant/pull/800 . >> It is pending review, but it provides some insights >> >> Based on feedback, I have added 2 votes to the Governance meeting: >> >> - Vote: Update from Contributor Covenant 1.3 to 1.4 >> - Vote: Update from Contributor Covenant 1.3 to 2.0 >> >> Best regards, >> Oleg >> >> On Saturday, June 13, 2020 at 8:49:58 PM UTC+2, Oleg Nenashev wrote: >>> >>> HiJeff, >>> >>> I agree that Contributor Covenant 2.0 is generally better, especially >>> for a large community like Jenkins. This version basically includes >>> statements of the Community Covenant which covers wider areas. I am fine >>> with exploring this option more. >>> >>> I have contacted the Contributor Covenant author in the GitHub Issue >>> referenced above. Maybe we could have an official changelog for this >>> version. Once ready I will submit a question to CDF TOC about using this >>> version, it is important to have explicit sign-off so that we comply with >>> Graduated Project requirements. >>> >>> Let's discuss both 1.4 and 2.0 options at the next governance meeting. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Oleg >>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/e75bd80d-9e4c-485e-9470-6ff677e067a4o%40googlegroups.com.
