Update w.r.t the code of conduct update options:

   - We got a response from Dan Lorenc (CDF TOC chair) about going with 2.0:* 
   "I think from the TOC perspective, we're fine with anything above 
   Contributor Covenant 1.3. We'd prefer projects upgrade over time, but don't 
   want to be prescriptive about when or how." *
   https://lists.cd.foundation/g/cdf-toc/message/442. I interpret is as 
   that we could go with 2.0
   - I submitted a pull request to Contributor Covenant which summarizes 
   the changes between 1.4 and 2.0: 
   https://github.com/ContributorCovenant/contributor_covenant/pull/800 . 
   It is pending review, but it provides some insights 
   
Based on feedback, I have added 2 votes to the Governance meeting:

   - Vote: Update from Contributor Covenant 1.3 to 1.4
   - Vote: Update from Contributor Covenant 1.3 to 2.0

Best regards,
Oleg

On Saturday, June 13, 2020 at 8:49:58 PM UTC+2, Oleg Nenashev wrote:
>
> HiJeff,
>
> I agree that Contributor Covenant 2.0 is generally better, especially for 
> a large community like Jenkins. This version basically includes statements 
> of the Community Covenant which covers wider areas. I am fine with 
> exploring this option more.
>
> I have contacted the Contributor Covenant author in the GitHub Issue 
> referenced above. Maybe we could have an official changelog for this 
> version. Once ready I will submit a question to CDF TOC about using this 
> version, it is important to have explicit sign-off so that we comply with 
> Graduated Project requirements.
>
> Let's discuss both 1.4 and 2.0 options at the next governance meeting.
>
> Best regards,
> Oleg
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/5624143c-918e-414a-8626-057deb76cc01o%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to