https://issues.jenkins.io/browse/JENKINS-65605 for tracking purposes.
KK has been pinged to see if someone can get access, (even if just to approve a transfer request). /James On Tuesday, May 11, 2021 at 11:05:58 AM UTC+1 [email protected] wrote: > The bridge method injector project looks abandoned? We may need to fork it > to release a fix > > On Tue, 11 May 2021 at 11:00, [email protected] <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> There are 2 regressions that I know of currently in 2.288, one is a >> blocker and the other possibly so. >> >> 1. the `WithBridgeMethods` annotation no longer works and so we would >> break compatibility with plugins using bridge methods from core PR to fix >> the injector is >> https://github.com/infradna/bridge-method-injector/pull/25 and this will >> need a release and a Jenkins PR and then backporting. (will create a Jira >> soon) >> >> 2. the HTML form submission has broken quite a few tests (could be >> HTMLUnit bug, or other but there are a number of plugins now with failing >> tests when bumping to this core) >> -> https://issues.jenkins.io/browse/JENKINS-65585 , >> https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/5405#issuecomment-836265920 >> and https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/5479 >> >> >> /James >> >> On Monday, May 10, 2021 at 3:55:22 PM UTC+1 Oleg Nenashev wrote: >> >>> Then let's postpone it until .2 at least >>> >>> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 4:44 PM Basil Crow <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 2:35 AM Oleg Nenashev <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > I wonder whether we should also create a Remoting 4.8 backport this >>>> time: https://github.com/jenkinsci/remoting/releases/tag/remoting-4.8 >>>> > There are 2 bugfixes which seem important though we could also just >>>> embed 4.8 into the LTS line. THere is one performance RFE and one minor >>>> feature added, so just backporting the version looks safe enough >>>> >>>> #449 is off-by-default and anyway only applies to the Swarm client >>>> rather than the Jenkins controller. The other changes, while not >>>> regression fixes, seem safe to me. I don't feel strongly either way. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the >>>> Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit >>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/jenkinsci-dev/TPQum9wHFVg/unsubscribe >>>> . >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to >>>> [email protected]. >>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAFwNDjqR22pncxWPsmBq3biGDZZWtHBoN2Bm%2B1qfbv%3DXY1WhEQ%40mail.gmail.com >>>> . >>>> >>> -- >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Jenkins Developers" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/c1032e1c-b60b-4780-8d9e-a4fd116f9c36n%40googlegroups.com >> >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/c1032e1c-b60b-4780-8d9e-a4fd116f9c36n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/548b7ee5-8e71-4144-86e0-6265035e85adn%40googlegroups.com.
