bridge-method-injector 1.21 <https://github.com/infradna/bridge-method-injector/releases/tag/bridge-method-injector-parent-1.21> has been released.
On Tuesday, May 11, 2021 at 12:34:27 PM UTC+1 [email protected] wrote: > https://issues.jenkins.io/browse/JENKINS-65605 for tracking purposes. > > KK has been pinged to see if someone can get access, (even if just to > approve a transfer request). > > /James > > On Tuesday, May 11, 2021 at 11:05:58 AM UTC+1 [email protected] wrote: > >> The bridge method injector project looks abandoned? We may need to fork >> it to release a fix >> >> On Tue, 11 May 2021 at 11:00, [email protected] <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> There are 2 regressions that I know of currently in 2.288, one is a >>> blocker and the other possibly so. >>> >>> 1. the `WithBridgeMethods` annotation no longer works and so we would >>> break compatibility with plugins using bridge methods from core PR to fix >>> the injector is >>> https://github.com/infradna/bridge-method-injector/pull/25 and this >>> will need a release and a Jenkins PR and then backporting. (will create a >>> Jira soon) >>> >>> 2. the HTML form submission has broken quite a few tests (could be >>> HTMLUnit bug, or other but there are a number of plugins now with failing >>> tests when bumping to this core) >>> -> https://issues.jenkins.io/browse/JENKINS-65585 , >>> https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/5405#issuecomment-836265920 >>> and https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/5479 >>> >>> >>> /James >>> >>> On Monday, May 10, 2021 at 3:55:22 PM UTC+1 Oleg Nenashev wrote: >>> >>>> Then let's postpone it until .2 at least >>>> >>>> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 4:44 PM Basil Crow <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 2:35 AM Oleg Nenashev <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > I wonder whether we should also create a Remoting 4.8 backport this >>>>> time: https://github.com/jenkinsci/remoting/releases/tag/remoting-4.8 >>>>> > There are 2 bugfixes which seem important though we could also just >>>>> embed 4.8 into the LTS line. THere is one performance RFE and one minor >>>>> feature added, so just backporting the version looks safe enough >>>>> >>>>> #449 is off-by-default and anyway only applies to the Swarm client >>>>> rather than the Jenkins controller. The other changes, while not >>>>> regression fixes, seem safe to me. I don't feel strongly either way. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the >>>>> Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit >>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/jenkinsci-dev/TPQum9wHFVg/unsubscribe >>>>> . >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to >>>>> [email protected]. >>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAFwNDjqR22pncxWPsmBq3biGDZZWtHBoN2Bm%2B1qfbv%3DXY1WhEQ%40mail.gmail.com >>>>> . >>>>> >>>> -- >>> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Jenkins Developers" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/c1032e1c-b60b-4780-8d9e-a4fd116f9c36n%40googlegroups.com >>> >>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/c1032e1c-b60b-4780-8d9e-a4fd116f9c36n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>> . >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/d24d1e9e-b315-427b-89d9-1d86a970d621n%40googlegroups.com.
