On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 08:26:57AM -0400, Brent Atkinson wrote:
> Magnus,
> 
> If I remember correctly, the pattern is similar if not the same as
> Trac's issue pattern. It is odd you don't see anything at all in the
> build log, but since you mentioned you are using trac 1.0 and a
> project, the xmlrpc interface may not be compatible. It was built on
> older revs of trac that didnt support multiple projects.

Wouldn't the plugin report the error to the build log (or somewhere
else)?
If it tries to use the URL I provided I ought to see something in the
webserver's access log on tracsrv.local.  However, I really see
*nothing*.  So it looks like the plugin never runs at all.

> There is not a lot of information to go on here, but I have been
> meaning to try the plugin in a trac 1.0 multi-project setup since it
> may break assumptions this was built on. Feel free to take a peek at
> the source yourself in the mean time. It is a quick read.

I'm not sure what you mean by multi-project, but AFAIK nothing that
would qualify as multi-project in my mind has entered Trac since 0.12.
When I mentioned 'project' in the earlier post I think I was referring
to a 'Jenkins project'.

/M

-- 
Magnus Therning                      OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 
email: [email protected]   jabber: [email protected]
twitter: magthe               http://therning.org/magnus


Perl is another example of filling a tiny, short-term need, and then
being a real problem in the longer term.
     -- Alan Kay

Attachment: pgpxUQQOt40Nt.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to