OK then let's go back to your original question. You say you"need to bump
version numbers". I would guess this is actually not the root reason.

Why do you want to do that?

I mean: if they are different jobs, so probably for different things, why
would want to do that?

It does indeed seem surprising to me at first sight.

Le 17 oct. 2016 4:28 PM, "Guy Matz" <[email protected]> a écrit :

> Yeah, sorry, I'm not actually suggesting bumping version #s is the way to
> go . . .  I was hoping that maybe I was approaching the problem the wrong
> way, and that someone had a better idea.  Thanks!!
>
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:00 AM, 'Björn Pedersen' via Jenkins Users <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> It could be done, but think about using  a better versioning scheme.
>> Using build numbers  from different jobs seems like a way to ask for
>> trouble.
>>
>> Take a look at:
>>   https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Version+Number+Plugin
>>   https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/semantic-versioning-plugin
>>   https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Next+Build+Number+Plugin
>>
>> Björn
>>
>>
>> Am Montag, 17. Oktober 2016 15:44:25 UTC+2 schrieb Guy Matz:
>>>
>>> Hello!  I need to be able to bump version numbers between two different
>>> jobs, meaning that if job A runs, it should have a build number higher that
>>> job B, and if job B runs, it should have a build # higher than job A . . .
>>>  for example, job A may run 10 ten times and have a build number of 10.
>>> Then job B will run and needs a build # of 11.  Job A wight run after than
>>> and needs a build # of 12.
>>>
>>> Anyone know how to do this?  I *think* I need this because I am going to
>>> have parallel tracks in my SDLC:  my usual develop -> master and a new
>>> hotfix -> master SDLC being build by a separate job.  Do I need this?  Any
>>> better ideas out there?  This seems like a common enough problem that it's
>>> already been solved six ways to sunday . . .
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot,
>>> Guy
>>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Jenkins Users" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ms
>> gid/jenkinsci-users/ff35676e-c537-493d-ab45-62a5ce42ca8f%
>> 40googlegroups.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/ff35676e-c537-493d-ab45-62a5ce42ca8f%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Jenkins Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/
> msgid/jenkinsci-users/CABnTgtWcTbM%2B4UKXifEmAo1TWDZr8jWny9W%
> 2BgJ817iFpgvhg3A%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/CABnTgtWcTbM%2B4UKXifEmAo1TWDZr8jWny9W%2BgJ817iFpgvhg3A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/CANWgJS66KV34yQXdUGxTBKHbH3d4WK1vGRo36PPpMhjPO87qzg%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to