----- Original Message ----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thursday, October 23, 2003 8:51 am Subject: Re: JESS: RDF
> I haven't heard of anyone doing this with RDF generally, but there are > wuite a few people doing this with DAML, which is quite similar. The > DAML folks use ordered facts instead of using named slots for each > component (despite my repeated warnings that their approach is very > inefficient compared to using named slots!) So I'm both familiar with, > and approve of, your approach. At least on my part, the message was eventually heard! OWLJessKB, basically a rewrite of DAMLJessKB for OWL, uses named slots. It has the added advantage of being much cleaner to work in and there's less headaches making sule everything's in the correct place. Should have been done a while ago, but the rulebase for DJKB had a fair bit of inertia to it. The rewrite for OWL presented a good opportunity to switch. -- - joe kopena -------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]' in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the list (use your own address!) List problems? Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
