----- Original Message ----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thursday, October 23, 2003 3:23 pm Subject: Re: JESS: RDF
> Glad to hear it! Did you notice a performance improvement? I think so, but I'm not sure. It's not as capable as DJKB yet so the comparison is unfair. Also, some of the DAML semantics generate a lot of excess triples which OWL doesn't so the comparison may never be fair. But, it does certainly feel a lot cleaner to develop in. Also, for anyone who's interested, I just put up a preliminary version of OWLJessKB at [1]. It only supports most of OWL Lite at the moment, but is worth playing around with. On an unrelated note, Dr Friedman-Hill, at the Semantic Web Conference last week there were a lot of people playing around with Jess as their inference tool, both with DJKB and without. Everyone using it had only good things to say about Jess, but I have to admit there were more than a few interested potential users that were asking me about rule editor GUIs and things like that, so maybe they're not such a bad thing... :) [1] http://edge.mcs.drexel.edu/assemblies/software/owljesskb/ -------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]' in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the list (use your own address!) List problems? Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
