David Sean Taylor wrote:
>Chris,
>
>Sorry but I've lost track of this thread, but it appears that your problem
>*still* hasn't been addressed.
>I guess my question is:
>
>Which version of the Turbine jar do you need, and does it include Raphael's
>JSP fix?
>Where can we get this jar from?
>
>Quote form Martin Poesch Sept 5:
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>the patch is checked in in the turbine-2 repository (2.2b1-dev)
>i don't know if the velocity stuff is checked in ..
>there will be a official turbine-2.2b1 soon (i only need to setup my linux
>box
>;-)
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Is this 'official turbine-2.2b1' available now, with Raphael's fix?
>
Not yet. I have just updated to today's nightly build (there has not
been cvs activity in at least two days). We wait, then, for the official
turbine-2.2 unless there are other patches to check during the beta
period, I think. It includes other JDBC patches, apart from Raphael's.
>
>
>David
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Chris Kimpton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 1:05 PM
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: Re: Can we upgrade to the latest turbine 2.2b1 please?
>>
>>
>>Hi,
>>
>>--- Santiago Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>If
>>>anybody can point me to the right jar file *and* the right
>>>changelog
>>>comment saying where the jar comes from and where to fetch the
>>>exact
>>>source files to reconstruct it, I'll do the update.
>>>
>>The turbine sources I started from are for the turbine-2 source tree
>>of Sep 4, approximately 10:20 GMT.
>>
>>Not a very satisfactory, I know - but no worse than what is being
>>done currently.
>>
>>You could keep a copy of the turbine sources in the jetspeed cvs too
>>- at least while working with unreleased turbine code. This gives
>>you the backup of knowing you have the source.
>>
>>The turbine tree has been moved a few times - so knowing the date/tag
>>of the version you are using of it is not always sufficient to get
>>the sources.
>>
>>If the decision is to wait for an official, then so be it.
>>
>>>I see there are reasons to update the jar, but I have been very
>>>confused
>>>by the fact that our jar *is* already called turbine-2.2b1.jar. I
>>>thought the change was already done.
>>>
>>Your not the only one ;-)
>>
>>Regards,
>>Chris
>>
>>=====
>>Need somewhere to Live in London - http://freeflats.com
>>
>>__________________________________________________
>>Do You Yahoo!?
>>Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with
>>Yahoo! Messenger
>>http://im.yahoo.com
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
