> So - for the first phase - > we just would like to switch the UserManagement > to this sole thing - and thats it.
Okay, you are allowed to do it just the way you want. I just wanted to point out that you cannot have 'plain' users without any associations to the group, role and permission information. At least you have to assign fixed roles and groups for your users. > services.UserManagement.classname= ... TurbineUserManagement? > and > services.JetspeedSecurity.user.class= ... BaseJetspeedUser Yes, these two. Create your own implementation by subclassing these original classes, and try to override just the methods you really have to. There's lot of functionality in them that you can take advantage of. Regards, Sami -- Sami Leino Software Developer, Netorek Oy, Turku, Finland Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: +358 44 0140499 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
