DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17756>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17756 MVCPortlet Proposal ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-10 20:04 ------- Sounds good Scott. Please integrate with my second source zip attachment that is completely cleaned, apache licensed and stylechecked. Shouldn't the view processors only deal with the context, not the http request. Isn't everything you need in the context, ie portlet,etc. I';m a little confused why you are adding stuff to the httprequest object, isn't that kinda naughty since it didn't come in with the request that it represents? If you notice, the init of the view processor is called with the portlet object, if you need other objects to initialize the view processor just add them to the call to init, if the parade gets too large there could be a processor config object that gets passes with all of em inside. But I might be missing the idea here. :) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
