DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17756>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17756 MVCPortlet Proposal ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-10 22:50 ------- Hey Scott - Are we going to make it clear that subclassing MVCPortlet is not nessesarary or desireable, and that we are only doing it for backwards compatiblility. Could we make the same backward compatability available through registry entries rather than subclassing? What do you think? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
