> Am I correct in understanding that Jetspeed 2.0 will not use the Turbine
> framework at all?

Jetspeed 2 uses no framework whatsoever.

For more info on "what is portal" in respect to JSR-168 look at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg08433.html




Regards,
*================================* 
| Scott T Weaver                 |
| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>            | 
| Apache Jetspeed Portal Project |
| Apache Pluto Portlet Container |
*================================*

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Celeste Haseltine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 10:20 AM
> To: 'Jetspeed Users List'
> Subject: RE: Difference Pluto <-> Jetspeed
> 
> Ramiro,
> 
> Thank you for the clarification.  I am not familiar with Turbine, and my
> discussions with members of the Dallas JavaMug who have used Turbine is to
> avoid it if you are on a very ambitious development timeframe and are not
> already familiar with it.  I gathered that there is a pretty steep
> learning
> curve with Turbine.
> 
> Am I correct in understanding that Jetspeed 2.0 will not use the Turbine
> framework at all?
> 
> Celeste
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ramiro Rinaudo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 9:55 PM
> To: Jetspeed Users List
> Subject: Re: Difference Pluto <-> Jetspeed
> 
> 
> Pluto is a portlet container, as tomcat is a servlet container. Turbine is
> a
> J2EE web development framework. Jetspeed1 uses lots of services of
> turbine,
> but it is not a portlet container. Jetspeed2 uses pluto to manage portlets
> lifecycle, and tomcat to manage Jetspeed2 servlet lifecycle.
> Hope this clear your view about this.
> 
> Ramiro
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Celeste Haseltine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'Jetspeed Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 5:16 PM
> Subject: RE: Difference Pluto <-> Jetspeed
> 
> 
> > Gerald,
> >
> > That is my understanding.  Jetspeed currently uses Turbine, but will use
> > Pluto in version 2.0.  Pluto has just gone final as version 1.0 (if I
> > understood what was on the boards last week correctly), and will become
> the
> > underlying "container" or "framework" by which Jetspeed 2.0 will be
> > developed on top of.  Pluto is JSR 168 compliant, but the currently beta
> > release of Jetspeed is not 169 compliant(if I understand correctly).
> > Someone correct me if I am wrong on this.
> >
> > Celeste
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Gerald Stampfel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 1:53 PM
> > To: Jetspeed Users List
> > Subject: Re: Difference Pluto <-> Jetspeed
> >
> >
> > So, Turbine is the portlet container of Jetspeed 1.
> >
> > True?
> >
> > -
> > Gerald Stampfel
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Roger Ruttimann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Jetspeed Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 5:11 PM
> > Subject: RE: Difference Pluto <-> Jetspeed
> >
> >
> > > This is correct. Jetspeed-2 uses pluto as the portlet container not
> > Jetspeed.
> > > ROger
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Celeste Haseltine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Oct 27, 2003 7:41 AM
> > > To: 'Jetspeed Users List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Subject: RE: Difference Pluto <-> Jetspeed
> > >
> > > I thought the current beta version of Jetspeed was built on top of
> > Turbine,
> > > and that the new yet to be released version of Jetspeed (2.0) would be
> > built
> > > on top of Pluto.  Do I have this wrong?
> > >
> > > Celeste
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Youssef Mohammed
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 3:28 AM
> > > To: Jetspeed Users List
> > > Subject: RE: Difference Pluto <-> Jetspeed
> > >
> > >
> > > Pluto is a portlet container.  Jetspeed 2 is the actual portal.
> Jetspeed
> > 2
> > > uses Pluto as its container.
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Youssef Mohammed
> > > >
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2003 8:38 AM
> > > > To: Jetspeed Users List (E-mail)
> > > > Subject: J2 and Pluto ?
> > > >
> > > > Hi
> > > >   any body knows the defference between jakarta-pluto and jakarta-
> > > > jetspeed2 projects ?
> > > >
> > > > thkns
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: jetspeed-user-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Gerald Stampfel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2003 11:52 AM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Difference Pluto <-> Jetspeed
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi you gods :)
> > >
> > > simple question: what's the difference between pluto and jetspeed, the
> > > readme files of these both apache projects read like they're doing
> almost
> > > the same .. ?
> > >
> > > I know jetspeed and i would be surprised, if there are two Apache
> projects
> > > existing for exactly the same purpose. So what's the difference ?
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > -
> > > Gerald Stampfel
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to