No, Jetspeed 1 does not currently support JSR 168. I don't think there are any official plans to add this feature to Jestpeed 1 (spi) as all future development will be focused on J2. Of course, it is probably possible to create a JSR 168 container as a portlet in J1, there are just no plans I know of to do so.
No, portlets developed under J1 are not JSR 168 compliant, and will not run in J2 or any other JSR 168 container unmodified. However, I do believe there will be efforts to make a forward migration easy, and maybe even provide a container inside of the JSR 168 container to run J1 portlets. J1 portlets are pretty close to the spec however and it should be moderately easy to 'port' them to the JSR 168 container.
%regards -tk
At 09:18 PM 10/29/2003 +0100, Gerald Stampfel wrote:
Does Jetspeed (Jetspeed one, not two) support the JSR-168 ?
Are portlets, that have been developed for Jetspeed, compatible to Jetspeed 2; can they be used without modifications in Jetspeed 2 ?
Another one: is there a page that gives more information on Jetspeed 2 ? I didn't find anything on jakarta.apache.org concerning Jetspeed 2, only Jetspeed 1.
Thank you!
- Gerald Stampfel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- Original Message ----- From: "Weaver, Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Jetspeed Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 6:40 PM Subject: RE: Difference Pluto <-> Jetspeed
> > Am I correct in understanding that Jetspeed 2.0 will not use the Turbine > > framework at all? > > Jetspeed 2 uses no framework whatsoever. > > For more info on "what is portal" in respect to JSR-168 look at: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg08433.html > > > > > Regards, > *================================* > | Scott T Weaver | > | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | > | Apache Jetspeed Portal Project | > | Apache Pluto Portlet Container | > *================================* > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Celeste Haseltine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 10:20 AM > > To: 'Jetspeed Users List' > > Subject: RE: Difference Pluto <-> Jetspeed > > > > Ramiro, > > > > Thank you for the clarification. I am not familiar with Turbine, and my > > discussions with members of the Dallas JavaMug who have used Turbine is to > > avoid it if you are on a very ambitious development timeframe and are not > > already familiar with it. I gathered that there is a pretty steep > > learning > > curve with Turbine. > > > > Am I correct in understanding that Jetspeed 2.0 will not use the Turbine > > framework at all? > > > > Celeste > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ramiro Rinaudo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 9:55 PM > > To: Jetspeed Users List > > Subject: Re: Difference Pluto <-> Jetspeed > > > > > > Pluto is a portlet container, as tomcat is a servlet container. Turbine is > > a > > J2EE web development framework. Jetspeed1 uses lots of services of > > turbine, > > but it is not a portlet container. Jetspeed2 uses pluto to manage portlets > > lifecycle, and tomcat to manage Jetspeed2 servlet lifecycle. > > Hope this clear your view about this. > > > > Ramiro > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Celeste Haseltine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "'Jetspeed Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 5:16 PM > > Subject: RE: Difference Pluto <-> Jetspeed > > > > > > > Gerald, > > > > > > That is my understanding. Jetspeed currently uses Turbine, but will use > > > Pluto in version 2.0. Pluto has just gone final as version 1.0 (if I > > > understood what was on the boards last week correctly), and will become > > the > > > underlying "container" or "framework" by which Jetspeed 2.0 will be > > > developed on top of. Pluto is JSR 168 compliant, but the currently beta > > > release of Jetspeed is not 169 compliant(if I understand correctly). > > > Someone correct me if I am wrong on this. > > > > > > Celeste > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Gerald Stampfel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 1:53 PM > > > To: Jetspeed Users List > > > Subject: Re: Difference Pluto <-> Jetspeed > > > > > > > > > So, Turbine is the portlet container of Jetspeed 1. > > > > > > True? > > > > > > - > > > Gerald Stampfel > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Roger Ruttimann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "Jetspeed Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 5:11 PM > > > Subject: RE: Difference Pluto <-> Jetspeed > > > > > > > > > > This is correct. Jetspeed-2 uses pluto as the portlet container not > > > Jetspeed. > > > > ROger > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Celeste Haseltine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Sent: Oct 27, 2003 7:41 AM > > > > To: 'Jetspeed Users List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Subject: RE: Difference Pluto <-> Jetspeed > > > > > > > > I thought the current beta version of Jetspeed was built on top of > > > Turbine, > > > > and that the new yet to be released version of Jetspeed (2.0) would be > > > built > > > > on top of Pluto. Do I have this wrong? > > > > > > > > Celeste > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Youssef Mohammed > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 3:28 AM > > > > To: Jetspeed Users List > > > > Subject: RE: Difference Pluto <-> Jetspeed > > > > > > > > > > > > Pluto is a portlet container. Jetspeed 2 is the actual portal. > > Jetspeed > > > 2 > > > > uses Pluto as its container. > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Youssef Mohammed > > > > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2003 8:38 AM > > > > > To: Jetspeed Users List (E-mail) > > > > > Subject: J2 and Pluto ? > > > > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > any body knows the defference between jakarta-pluto and jakarta- > > > > > jetspeed2 projects ? > > > > > > > > > > thkns > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > - > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: jetspeed-user- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Gerald Stampfel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2003 11:52 AM > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: Difference Pluto <-> Jetspeed > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi you gods :) > > > > > > > > simple question: what's the difference between pluto and jetspeed, the > > > > readme files of these both apache projects read like they're doing > > almost > > > > the same .. ? > > > > > > > > I know jetspeed and i would be surprised, if there are two Apache > > projects > > > > existing for exactly the same purpose. So what's the difference ? > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > - > > > > Gerald Stampfel > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
