Does Jetspeed (Jetspeed one, not two) support the JSR-168 ?

Are portlets, that have been developed for Jetspeed, compatible to Jetspeed
2; can they be used without modifications in Jetspeed 2 ?

Another one: is there a page that gives more information on Jetspeed 2 ? I
didn't find anything on jakarta.apache.org concerning Jetspeed 2, only
Jetspeed 1.

Thank you!

-
Gerald Stampfel
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Weaver, Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Jetspeed Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 6:40 PM
Subject: RE: Difference Pluto <-> Jetspeed


> > Am I correct in understanding that Jetspeed 2.0 will not use the Turbine
> > framework at all?
>
> Jetspeed 2 uses no framework whatsoever.
>
> For more info on "what is portal" in respect to JSR-168 look at:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg08433.html
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
> *================================*
> | Scott T Weaver                 |
> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>            |
> | Apache Jetspeed Portal Project |
> | Apache Pluto Portlet Container |
> *================================*
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Celeste Haseltine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 10:20 AM
> > To: 'Jetspeed Users List'
> > Subject: RE: Difference Pluto <-> Jetspeed
> >
> > Ramiro,
> >
> > Thank you for the clarification.  I am not familiar with Turbine, and my
> > discussions with members of the Dallas JavaMug who have used Turbine is
to
> > avoid it if you are on a very ambitious development timeframe and are
not
> > already familiar with it.  I gathered that there is a pretty steep
> > learning
> > curve with Turbine.
> >
> > Am I correct in understanding that Jetspeed 2.0 will not use the Turbine
> > framework at all?
> >
> > Celeste
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ramiro Rinaudo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 9:55 PM
> > To: Jetspeed Users List
> > Subject: Re: Difference Pluto <-> Jetspeed
> >
> >
> > Pluto is a portlet container, as tomcat is a servlet container. Turbine
is
> > a
> > J2EE web development framework. Jetspeed1 uses lots of services of
> > turbine,
> > but it is not a portlet container. Jetspeed2 uses pluto to manage
portlets
> > lifecycle, and tomcat to manage Jetspeed2 servlet lifecycle.
> > Hope this clear your view about this.
> >
> > Ramiro
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Celeste Haseltine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "'Jetspeed Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 5:16 PM
> > Subject: RE: Difference Pluto <-> Jetspeed
> >
> >
> > > Gerald,
> > >
> > > That is my understanding.  Jetspeed currently uses Turbine, but will
use
> > > Pluto in version 2.0.  Pluto has just gone final as version 1.0 (if I
> > > understood what was on the boards last week correctly), and will
become
> > the
> > > underlying "container" or "framework" by which Jetspeed 2.0 will be
> > > developed on top of.  Pluto is JSR 168 compliant, but the currently
beta
> > > release of Jetspeed is not 169 compliant(if I understand correctly).
> > > Someone correct me if I am wrong on this.
> > >
> > > Celeste
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Gerald Stampfel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 1:53 PM
> > > To: Jetspeed Users List
> > > Subject: Re: Difference Pluto <-> Jetspeed
> > >
> > >
> > > So, Turbine is the portlet container of Jetspeed 1.
> > >
> > > True?
> > >
> > > -
> > > Gerald Stampfel
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Roger Ruttimann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "Jetspeed Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 5:11 PM
> > > Subject: RE: Difference Pluto <-> Jetspeed
> > >
> > >
> > > > This is correct. Jetspeed-2 uses pluto as the portlet container not
> > > Jetspeed.
> > > > ROger
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Celeste Haseltine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Sent: Oct 27, 2003 7:41 AM
> > > > To: 'Jetspeed Users List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Subject: RE: Difference Pluto <-> Jetspeed
> > > >
> > > > I thought the current beta version of Jetspeed was built on top of
> > > Turbine,
> > > > and that the new yet to be released version of Jetspeed (2.0) would
be
> > > built
> > > > on top of Pluto.  Do I have this wrong?
> > > >
> > > > Celeste
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Youssef Mohammed
> > > >
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 3:28 AM
> > > > To: Jetspeed Users List
> > > > Subject: RE: Difference Pluto <-> Jetspeed
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Pluto is a portlet container.  Jetspeed 2 is the actual portal.
> > Jetspeed
> > > 2
> > > > uses Pluto as its container.
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Youssef Mohammed
> > > > >
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2003 8:38 AM
> > > > > To: Jetspeed Users List (E-mail)
> > > > > Subject: J2 and Pluto ?
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi
> > > > >   any body knows the defference between jakarta-pluto and jakarta-
> > > > > jetspeed2 projects ?
> > > > >
> > > > > thkns
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: jetspeed-user-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Gerald Stampfel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2003 11:52 AM
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: Difference Pluto <-> Jetspeed
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi you gods :)
> > > >
> > > > simple question: what's the difference between pluto and jetspeed,
the
> > > > readme files of these both apache projects read like they're doing
> > almost
> > > > the same .. ?
> > > >
> > > > I know jetspeed and i would be surprised, if there are two Apache
> > projects
> > > > existing for exactly the same purpose. So what's the difference ?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > >
> > > > -
> > > > Gerald Stampfel
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to