Is jetspeed compatible with OAS (Oracle Applications Server)? On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Mansour Al Akeel <[email protected] > wrote:
> Hello Ron: > > Jetspeed 2.2 uses pluto 2.0 which is the aligned version with JSR 286. > So yes, We are expecting a full compatibilty with the new specs. > > > > > On Sun Apr 19,2009 07:39 am, Ron McNulty wrote: > > Hi David > > > > Portlet 2.0? Is that full JSR286 compatability? > > > > Great if it will be... > > > > Regards > > > > Ron > > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Sean Taylor" > > <[email protected]> > > To: "Jetspeed Users List" <[email protected]> > > Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 5:44 AM > > Subject: Re: Release of Jetspeed 2.2 > > > > > >> On Apr 15, 2009, at 8:35 AM, Jeff Pierce wrote: > >>> What is the release target for Jetspeed 2.2? I found several posts > from > >>> mid-last year but nothing recent. My project is considering using J2 > as > >>> the > >>> underlying technology for its portal-based user interface (shipping it > >>> with > >>> every user interface). The release date is 6+ months out. Would we > be > >>> better off starting with 2.1.3 and moving to 2.2 when it becomes > >>> available > >>> or is the current state of 2.2 stable enough for us to start our > >>> development > >>> against it? There is also the possibility that we could contribute > >>> back to > >>> the project itself if things worked out. > >>> > >> We have slipped quite a bit on the release of 2.2.0. The process of > >> getting Jetspeed and Pluto synchronized, plus all the new features in > the > >> Portlet 2.0 specification required a lot of refactoring and > >> implementation work. The team is working towards releasing by end of > >> April now. We have a small set of issues remaining, I believe its > >> possible to meet our date. We will also be releasing Pluto 2.0, and the > >> initial releases of Portals Applications within the same time period. > If > >> you are looking for Portlet 2.0 support, and working with all the new > >> Jetspeed features coming out this year following 2.2.0, I would > >> definitely recommend developing against the 2..2.0 release over the > 2.1.x > >> branch. We will maintain the 2.1.x branch for bug fixes. I hope to have > a > >> better roadmap on the site this week. Will send a link to this list > when > >> its there.. > >>> Has anyone else shipped Jetspeed as the major component of their user > >>> interface? Or is it primarily used as a development server or > intranet? > >> yes, absolutely. Speaking just for our company, we are developing > >> applications that can run in both our CMS product or Jetspeed equally. > We > >> are using Wicket and/or a CMS toolkit for our portlet application > >> development > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
