"Diethelm Guallar, Gonzalo" wrote:
>
> > Several things have changed regarding security and users, but nothing
> > dramatic. As far as I can see, references in a few classes
> > (about 5) have to be adapted.
> >
> > If nobody on the list objects, I'll migrate jetspeed to the
> > current turbine
> > version and send the patches to one of our "writers" for check in.
> >
> > Comments?
>
> There is an imminent merge of a Turbine branch with new code
> for users and security. I think you would be better off waiting
> for that.
>
> Also, I would place a high priority on the work of merging all
> of the latest Jetspeed changes into the HEAD branch, so that
> things compile again.
>
I agree. Merging the branches and landing this merge should be first
priority (and I think Santiago is tackling this). Once we have recovered
from this landing, update the Turbine dependencies in 2 areas:
user management and templating.
Landing the new user model in Jetspeed will require testing of all the
user registration/authentication process to make sure there are no hidden
bugs even if the code does compile. If you want to start working on
improving this, I think you can try to use the security-01-branch of Turbine
against the pre-proposal0003-no-psml branch of Jetspeed and cope with changes
produced by the merging of these branches in their respective trunks.
I've started working on a template aware implementation of the jetspeed
engine.
--
Rapha�l Luta - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
