> From: ingo schuster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 5:42 AM
>
> I think all of us who meet at the ApacheCON agreed, that we
> should migrate
> to a actual version of turbine as soon as possible, so that
> the gap doesn't
> get too wide. I checked out turbine from CVS this morning - I
> compiles
> without any problems.
> Several things have changed regarding security and users, but nothing
> dramatic. As far as I can see, references in a few classes
> (about 5) have
> to be adapted.
>
> If nobody on the list objects, I'll migrate jetspeed to the
> current turbine
> version and send the patches to one of our "writers" for check in.
>
> Comments?
+2. :) Seriously, this is a Very Good Thing. Our team here was
going to tackle it just as soon as the promised no-psml to head
merge occurs. Which branch were you considering working on, if
you're doing this in advance of that? Note that head doesn't
currently build from CVS.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
