At 12:26 2000/11/2 -0800, you wrote:
> > From: ingo schuster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 5:42 AM
> >
> > I think all of us who meet at the ApacheCON agreed, that we
> > should migrate
> > to a actual version of turbine as soon as possible, so that
> > the gap doesn't
> > get too wide. I checked out turbine from CVS this morning - I
> > compiles
> > without any problems.
> > Several things have changed regarding security and users, but nothing
> > dramatic. As far as I can see, references in a few classes
> > (about 5) have
> > to be adapted.
> >
> > If nobody on the list objects, I'll migrate jetspeed to the
> > current turbine
> > version and send the patches to one of our "writers" for check in.
> >
> > Comments?
>
>+2. :) Seriously, this is a Very Good Thing. Our team here was
>going to tackle it just as soon as the promised no-psml to head
>merge occurs. Which branch were you considering working on, if
>you're doing this in advance of that? Note that head doesn't
>currently build from CVS.
I used the pre-proposal-0003-no-psml branch (not the very latest, but
pretty much up to date) and tried to run it with turbine (head, not the
security branch) as of cvs yesterday - declarations in 5 jetspeed classes
need to be adapted and some lines added to TurbineResources.properties. As
far as I'm aware, everything is working fine.
I'll have a look into the turbine security branch today.
ingo.
>--
>--------------------------------------------------------------
>Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
>To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html>
>Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
