Raphael Luta wrote:
> That this code does not belong to Jetspeed but to the framework. ;)
>
> There are already way too many logging class around here and I don't
> see the point in implementing yet another one.
> Logging and debug features are important but should be (and maybe
> are already ) addressed by Turbine, so the extensions to the logging
> capabilities of Turbine should be discussed on Turbine.
>
> As for me, I'd be happy with any scheme right now because I don't think
> performance will be very important before 2 or 3 other alpha releases.
> I'd focus right now of usability and functionalities.
Ok, we'll move the discussion to the Turbine mailing list.
As soon as the Turbine Log class has the new mechanism, we should update
the trace statements in JetSpeed appropriately so that new code that is
written allows effective disabling of trace overhead from the beginning.
Best regards,
Thomas
Thomas Schaeck
IBM Pervasive Computing Division
Phone: +49-(0)7031-16-3479 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Address: IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH,
Schoenaicher Str. 220, 71032 Boeblingen, Germany
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/>
List Help?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
