Brian, I'm sorry I haven't gotten in sooner on this one. My husband, career 
graphic arts and electronics instructors says that it appears to him that there 
are times where information appears that can't be reached, or that I would have 
no way of knowing  that it is present. 

Bye for now,

Carolyn

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Vogel [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, January 29, 2016 10:31 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: How to have PDF files read in the Acrobat window and not Chrome

On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 05:59 pm, Brad Martin <[email protected]> wrote:


        Sorry, Brian, but that's a sighted response. We don't often have good 
luck with "pop-up menus" and "file icons." If we're lucky we might hear JAWS 
read them, but it's less common that we can get there from here and actually do 
something with them. If you know of some sort of keyboard command that can get 
us to where those notifications go, awesome. And I'll confess right now that I 
haven't read the rest of the day's mail yet. I just got home.

 Brad,

         My initial response when I read this was indignation and I was all 
prepared to go into high dudgeon about "how unfair" your opening line was.  
After spending about 20 minutes folding laundry and thinking about it my 
reaction is now an amused, "Duh, that's because I *am* sighted!!"  What I can, 
and I think do, bring to this conversation are some things that only vision 
makes "instantly obvious" that may be utterly opaque for a variety of reasons 
to someone using screen readers.  The way that downloads are being presented by 
various web browsers keeps changing, seemingly constantly.  What I always 
presume, and I'll be the first to admit that the presumption is sometimes 
wrong, is that it's possible that, for reasons you allude to, a screen reader 
user may not "be able to use" a given feature because they literally don't know 
it's there.  I also couple that with a presumption that once they know it's 
there they're more likely to know how to get to it and use it than I am, 
particularly without research.  Sometimes one or the other of these 
presumptions is simply not so, and I have no problem being called out on that.  
That being said, I don't exactly consider presuming much greater expertise on 
screen readers, and how to use them, among screen reader users while I'm 
tossing out "things I can see and that may be helpful and that may not be known 
about," to be "a sighted response" in the purest sense.  I'm trying to 
collaborate.

         As you know from some of our private correspondence, I seldom accept 
that something "can't be done" and tend to take the attitude that I/we don't 
know how to accomplish a given thing but there's got to be a way to do it, and 
then I dig in to figure out how, often with assistance from "the network" that 
I have.

         No one, prior to yourself, in this specific thread has indicated that 
anything I've mentioned is "something I can't get to," or I would have paused 
and tried to figure out how to remove that obstacle, if possible.  You can be 
assured when someone says, "I can't do that," which is different than, "But 
that's not happening," I won't be saying, "Well, tough, you should know how to 
do that."  A "but that's not happening" leads me to, "I'd have to be there to 
see what is or is not happening," when I cannot replicate the issue in any of 
the environments I have to try to replicate it in.  In that sense I am 
definitely completely dependent on sight, or as close to completely dependent 
as can be (I can envision some stuff, but there are limits).

         Now it's time to play with NVDA and Chrome and downloading something 
to see exactly how I can (if I can) gain access to the downloads bar at the 
bottom of the screen or to the same context menu via the downloads menu.

Brian




-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
--
JFW related links:
JFW homepage: http://www.freedomscientific.com/
JFW List instructions:
To post a message to the list, send it to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to 
[email protected]
Archives located at: http://www.groups.io/g/jfw/threads
Alternative archives located at: 
http://n2.nabble.com/JAWS-for-Windows-f2145279.html

If you have any concerns about the list, posts received from the list, or the 
way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the 
list owner at [email protected].
-=-=-
Groups.io Links:

You receive all messages sent to this group.

View This Message (#37675): https://groups.io/g/jfw/message/37675
Mute This Thread: https://groups.io/mt/557841?uid=21656

Change Your Subscription: https://groups.io/g/jfw/editsub?uid=21656
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/jfw/leave/46502/1292106160/xyzzy

Group Home: https://groups.io/g/jfw
Contact Group Owner: [email protected]
Terms of Service: https://groups.io/static/tos
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to