On Oct 5, 2009, at 6:37 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> Is `path_for` something that's actually used for something? If so,
> maybe the package name should be passed to it?
>
> Foo->path_for('Bar'); # returns /foo/foo
> Foo->path_for('Baz'); # returns /otherfoo/foo
>
> Thoughts?
FYI, I commented out path_for() and the two tests for it, and all
tests passed. So it doesn't seem necessary to the internals. Is it
used externally, e.g., in Jifty? Is it necessary? Could it be
deprecated?
Best,
David
_______________________________________________
jifty-devel mailing list
jifty-devel@lists.jifty.org
http://lists.jifty.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jifty-devel
