On Wed  7.Oct'09 at 22:20:08 -0700, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Oct 7, 2009, at 7:42 PM, Ruslan Zakirov wrote:
> 
> >> So even if I called `path_for('hello', 'Wifty::UI')`, what would it
> >> return?
> >
> > David, I took a look at path_for while we were discussing TD. It's
> > just a function we specific use case and may be it should be hidden
> > unless there requirement in similar general functionality.
> 
> Yes, talking to Sartak about it on IRC, we agreed that it should be  
> documented as deprecated. If it wasn't for the fact that it was  
> documented in the past, I would suggest not documenting it at all. But  
> alas, that's probably not the best option.

The specific usage I added this for, I _think_, was Jifty's CRUD
templates when subclassed inside an application.  But yeah, we'll need
to figure out a sane replacement for it.  Doccing it as deprecated with
the understanding that it needs to hang around until Jifty has moved on
is the right way forward.

Thanks again for all your work to improve Template::Declare, David. It's
hugely appreciated.

Best,
Jesse

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
jifty-devel mailing list
jifty-devel@lists.jifty.org
http://lists.jifty.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jifty-devel

Reply via email to