On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 1:56 AM, David E. Wheeler <da...@kineticode.com> wrote:
> On Oct 6, 2009, at 12:22 PM, Jesse Vincent wrote:
>
>>> A backwards-compatible change would be to allow the template class
>>> name to be passed, as I specified. If no argument is passed, it could
>>> fall back on the current behavior, which is simply the last class
>>> into
>>> which it was imported.
>>>
>>> I should look at how aliasing affects this, too…
>>
>> *nod* That sounds reasonable
>
> Crap. I just realized that this won't work either, because you can
> import the same templates into the same class with a different prefix.
>
> package Wifty::UI;
> import_templates Wifty::Mixin under '/mixout';
> import_templates Wifty::Mixin under '/mixin';
>
> So even if I called `path_for('hello', 'Wifty::UI')`, what would it
> return?
David, I took a look at path_for while we were discussing TD. It's
just a function we specific use case and may be it should be hidden
unless there requirement in similar general functionality.
>
> Best,
>
> David
>
> _______________________________________________
> jifty-devel mailing list
> jifty-devel@lists.jifty.org
> http://lists.jifty.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jifty-devel
>
--
Best regards, Ruslan.
_______________________________________________
jifty-devel mailing list
jifty-devel@lists.jifty.org
http://lists.jifty.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jifty-devel
