Let's leave it then.
-- Kevin
Chris Bensen wrote:
To be honest I messed up. I noticed when I was building and testing just before
sending out the review. I kinda liked it after I noticed but I’m good with
either one.
Chris
On Apr 27, 2016, at 1:59 PM, Mandy Chung <mandy.ch...@oracle.com> wrote:
On Apr 27, 2016, at 1:44 PM, Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com> wrote:
Looks fine to me, too.
Btw, I thought Mandy had earlier suggested jdk.tools.jlink.internal.packager as
a name, but it's currently jdk.tools.internal.packager (without the jlink). I
don't care one way or the other and the current one is shorter.
I don’t have a preference on either one. This is just temporary and this may go
away when jlink API is simplified and becomes stable (something to revisit
later).
Mandy
