Doesn’t look like it’s been pushed. I revised the change: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~cbensen/JDK-8150990/webrev.01/
Chris > On Apr 28, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Chris Bensen <chris.ben...@oracle.com> wrote: > > If it hasn’t been pushed I’ll change it? > > Chris > > >> On Apr 27, 2016, at 11:58 PM, Alan Bateman <alan.bate...@oracle.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 27/04/2016 21:44, Kevin Rushforth wrote: >>> Looks fine to me, too. >>> >>> Btw, I thought Mandy had earlier suggested >>> jdk.tools.jlink.internal.packager as a name, but it's currently >>> jdk.tools.internal.packager (without the jlink). I don't care one way or >>> the other and the current one is shorter. >> Mandy's suggestion sounds right to me as jlink already has internals in >> jdk.tools.jlink.internal.**. If it's temporary then the suggest is probably >> okay although if temporary means to JDK 9 GA then it might be better to >> change it now. >> >> -Alan >
