On 27/04/2016 21:44, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
Looks fine to me, too.
Btw, I thought Mandy had earlier suggested
jdk.tools.jlink.internal.packager as a name, but it's currently
jdk.tools.internal.packager (without the jlink). I don't care one way
or the other and the current one is shorter.
Mandy's suggestion sounds right to me as jlink already has internals in
jdk.tools.jlink.internal.**. If it's temporary then the suggest is
probably okay although if temporary means to JDK 9 GA then it might be
better to change it now.
-Alan
