Re: Ugly things done to support multiple ContentHandlerFactory and URLStreamHandlerFactory

[Alan Bateman]

On 13/10/2016 16:46, Thomas Watson wrote:
If not, are there going to be command line options that will allow us
to open up deep reflection of specific VM types as a compatibility mode
until we can get a proper solution?

There is a command-line option, in this case `--add-exports-private 
java.base/java.net=ALL-UNNAMED` will allow code on the class path (or 
any custom class loader) to continue to break into non-public members of 
java.net.URL or other types in this package.

-Alan