Ouch. Thats an unpleasant result. It should have gone in `java.lang.annotation`. Stephen
On 20 September 2017 at 13:49, Alan Bateman <alan.bate...@oracle.com> wrote: > On 20/09/2017 13:43, Stephen Colebourne wrote: >> >> As per this email: >> >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jigsaw-dev/2017-February/011365.html >> the idea was to add a new annotation `java.lang.annotation.Generated` >> to replace the old problematic one. >> >> Is it my imagination, or did this get forgotten?: >> > > The discussion/review moved to core-libs-dev and compiler-dev in March, here > it is: > > http://download.java.net/java/jdk9/docs/api/javax/annotation/processing/Generated.html
