And possibly have retention "class" On Sep 20, 2017 14:59, "Stephen Colebourne" <scolebou...@joda.org> wrote:
> Ouch. Thats an unpleasant result. It should have gone in > `java.lang.annotation`. > Stephen > > On 20 September 2017 at 13:49, Alan Bateman <alan.bate...@oracle.com> > wrote: > > On 20/09/2017 13:43, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > >> > >> As per this email: > >> > >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jigsaw-dev/2017- > February/011365.html > >> the idea was to add a new annotation `java.lang.annotation.Generated` > >> to replace the old problematic one. > >> > >> Is it my imagination, or did this get forgotten?: > >> > > > > The discussion/review moved to core-libs-dev and compiler-dev in March, > here > > it is: > > > > http://download.java.net/java/jdk9/docs/api/javax/annotation/processing/ > Generated.html >
