And just noting that the thread in March did not call out the fact that the webrev did not correspond to the original agreed change from Mark/jigsaw-dev. The only way you'd have spotted the package was javax.annotation.processing and not java.lang.annotation is by clicking on the webrev itself. Sorry, but I'm not impressed by this.
Stephen On 20 September 2017 at 13:58, Stephen Colebourne <scolebou...@joda.org> wrote: > Ouch. Thats an unpleasant result. It should have gone in > `java.lang.annotation`. > Stephen > > On 20 September 2017 at 13:49, Alan Bateman <alan.bate...@oracle.com> wrote: >> On 20/09/2017 13:43, Stephen Colebourne wrote: >>> >>> As per this email: >>> >>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jigsaw-dev/2017-February/011365.html >>> the idea was to add a new annotation `java.lang.annotation.Generated` >>> to replace the old problematic one. >>> >>> Is it my imagination, or did this get forgotten?: >>> >> >> The discussion/review moved to core-libs-dev and compiler-dev in March, here >> it is: >> >> http://download.java.net/java/jdk9/docs/api/javax/annotation/processing/Generated.html
