jolshan commented on code in PR #17454:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/17454#discussion_r1795969978
##########
docs/design.html:
##########
@@ -290,24 +290,56 @@ <h3 class="anchor-heading"><a id="semantics"
class="anchor-link"></a><a href="#s
messages have a primary key and so the updates are idempotent (receiving
the same message twice just overwrites a record with another copy of itself).
</ol>
<p>
- So what about exactly once semantics (i.e. the thing you actually want)?
When consuming from a Kafka topic and producing to another topic (as in a <a
href="https://kafka.apache.org/documentation/streams";>Kafka Streams</a>
- application), we can leverage the new transactional producer capabilities
in 0.11.0.0 that were mentioned above. The consumer's position is stored as a
message in a topic, so we can write the offset to Kafka in the
- same transaction as the output topics receiving the processed data. If the
transaction is aborted, the consumer's position will revert to its old value
and the produced data on the output topics will not be visible
- to other consumers, depending on their "isolation level." In the default
"read_uncommitted" isolation level, all messages are visible to consumers even
if they were part of an aborted transaction,
- but in "read_committed," the consumer will only return messages from
transactions which were committed (and any messages which were not part of a
transaction).
+ So what about exactly-once semantics? When consuming from a Kafka topic
and producing to another topic (as in a <a
href="https://kafka.apache.org/documentation/streams";>Kafka Streams</a>
application), we can
+ leverage the new transactional producer capabilities in 0.11.0.0 that were
mentioned above. The consumer's position is stored as a message in an internal
topic, so we can write the offset to Kafka in the
+ same transaction as the output topics receiving the processed data. If the
transaction is aborted, the consumer's stored position will revert to its old
value and the produced data on the output topics will not
+ be visible to other consumers, depending on their "isolation level." In
the default "read_uncommitted" isolation level, all messages are visible to
consumers even if they were part of an aborted transaction,
+ but in "read_committed" isolation level, the consumer will only return
messages from transactions which were committed (and any messages which were
not part of a transaction).
<p>
When writing to an external system, the limitation is in the need to
coordinate the consumer's position with what is actually stored as output. The
classic way of achieving this would be to introduce a two-phase
- commit between the storage of the consumer position and the storage of the
consumers output. But this can be handled more simply and generally by letting
the consumer store its offset in the same place as
+ commit between the storage of the consumer position and the storage of the
consumers output. This can be handled more simply and generally by letting the
consumer store its offset in the same place as
its output. This is better because many of the output systems a consumer
might want to write to will not support a two-phase commit. As an example of
this, consider a
<a href="https://kafka.apache.org/documentation/#connect";>Kafka
Connect</a> connector which populates data in HDFS along with the offsets of
the data it reads so that it is guaranteed that either data and
offsets are both updated or neither is. We follow similar patterns for
many other data systems which require these stronger semantics and for which
the messages do not have a primary key to allow for deduplication.
<p>
- So effectively Kafka supports exactly-once delivery in <a
href="https://kafka.apache.org/documentation/streams";>Kafka Streams</a>, and
the transactional producer/consumer can be used generally to provide
+ As a result, Kafka supports exactly-once delivery in <a
href="https://kafka.apache.org/documentation/streams";>Kafka Streams</a>, and
the transactional producer/consumer can be used generally to provide
exactly-once delivery when transferring and processing data between Kafka
topics. Exactly-once delivery for other destination systems generally requires
cooperation with such systems, but Kafka provides the
offset which makes implementing this feasible (see also <a
href="https://kafka.apache.org/documentation/#connect";>Kafka Connect</a>).
Otherwise, Kafka guarantees at-least-once delivery by default, and allows
the user to implement at-most-once delivery by disabling retries on the
producer and committing offsets in the consumer prior to processing a batch of
messages.
- <h3 class="anchor-heading"><a id="replication" class="anchor-link"></a><a
href="#replication">4.7 Replication</a></h3>
+ <h3 class="anchor-heading"><a id="usingtransactions"
class="anchor-link"></a><a href="#usingtransactions">4.7 Using
Transactions</a></h3>
+ <p>
+ As mentioned above, the simplest way to get exactly-once semantics from
Kafka is to use <a href="https://kafka.apache.org/documentation/streams";>Kafka
Streams</a>. However, it is also possible to achieve
+ the same transactional guarantees using the Kafka producer and consumer
directly by using them in the same way as Kafka Streams does.
+ <p>
+ Kafka transactions are a bit different than transactions in other
messaging systems. In Kafka, the consumer and producer are separate and it is
only the producer which is transactional. It is however able to
+ make transactional updates to the consumer's position (confusingly called
the "committed offset"), and it is this which gives the overall exactly-once
behavior.
+ <p>
+ There are three key aspects to exactly-once processing using the producer
and consumer, which match how Kafka Streams works.
+ <ol>
+ <li>The consumer uses partition assignment to ensure that it is the
only consumer in the consumer group currently processing each partition.</li>
+ <li>The consumer uses read-committed isolation level to ensure that it
does not consume records produced by transactions which aborted.</li>
+ <li>The producer uses transactions so that all of the records it
produces, and any offsets it updates on behalf of the consumer, are performed
atomically.</li>
+ </ol>
+ <p>
+ The consumer configuration must include
<code>isolation.level=read_committed</code> and
<code>enable.auto.commit=false</code>. The producer configuration must set
<code>transactional.id</code>
Review Comment:
I don't think the consumer necessarily needs to be read_committed unless it
is also reading from a topic written via transactions.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
