guozhangwang commented on code in PR #12104:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/12104#discussion_r871816260


##########
core/src/test/scala/integration/kafka/admin/TopicCommandIntegrationTest.scala:
##########
@@ -732,7 +733,18 @@ class TopicCommandIntegrationTest extends 
KafkaServerTestHarness with Logging wi
     try {
       killBroker(0)
       val aliveServers = brokers.filterNot(_.config.brokerId == 0)
-      TestUtils.waitForPartitionMetadata(aliveServers, underMinIsrTopic, 0)
+
+      if (isKRaftTest()) {
+        TestUtils.ensureConsistentKRaftMetadata(aliveServers, 
controllerServer, "Timeout waiting for topic configs propagating to brokers")
+      } else {
+        TestUtils.waitUntilTrue(
+          () => aliveServers.forall(
+            broker =>
+              broker.metadataCache.getPartitionInfo(underMinIsrTopic, 
0).get.isr().size() < 6 &&
+                broker.metadataCache.getPartitionInfo(offlineTopic, 
0).get.leader() == MetadataResponse.NO_LEADER_ID),

Review Comment:
   Why we need the second condition `leader() == 
MetadataResponse.NO_LEADER_ID)` as well? Could the new leader be elected after 
killing broker-0?



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to