On Apr 9, 2008, at 10:49 AM, damager wrote: > If I want the same "virtual experience" I get with SoftSqueeze, but > with the virtual device looking like the SBC, not the SB3, do I use > SqueezePlay? Yes.
> If yes, is the reason that a complied binary is not > available is because it isn't developed enough for a layman to play > with yet? Exactly. > Or can a skin be developed for SoftSqueeze that mimics the > SBC? Nope, that would be nearly impossible. Stay tuned... _______________________________________________ jive mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jive
