DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42226>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42226 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-02 00:35 ------- Indeed TransactionController seems to be aiming at what I would like. To me the name of the controller sounds a bit misleading though as you can group arbitrary listeners. It seems that you now have two ways of grouping listeners - through their labels and by placing them under a TransactionController. Having a Controller for the group is a better structure and GUI than grouping by labels on the other hand I am not sure that treating the group as a separate sample is a good model - as it is in fact not a separate sample but a group of samples. In summary reports could it not behave like labelgroups behave now? Only the aggregate function must be different - I could even imagine selectable. Now the summary function for labelgroups is AVERAGE, I would like to have SUM, but I can imagine somebody need e.g. MOST or LEAST. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
