DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42226>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42226 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-28 01:53 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Indeed TransactionController seems to be aiming at what I would like. > > To me the name of the controller sounds a bit misleading though as you can > group arbitrary listeners. > > It seems that you now have two ways of grouping listeners - through their > labels and by placing them under a TransactionController. > > Having a Controller for the group is a better structure and GUI than grouping > by labels on the other hand I am not sure that treating the group as a > separate sample is a good model - as it is in fact not a separate sample but > a > group of samples. > In summary reports could it not behave like labelgroups behave now? Only the > aggregate function must be different - I could even imagine selectable. Now > the summary function for labelgroups is AVERAGE, I would like to have SUM, > but > I can imagine somebody need e.g. MOST or LEAST. Hi I suggest that you try the latest nightly build of JMeter, it now contains the changes described in bug 41913 for TransactionController. Let us know if it suits your needs, and this bug can be closed as "fixed", or let us know what is missing. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
